Key Points
• Integration of Cash App (P2P) & Square (B2B) ecosystems: A closed-loop architecture reduces reliance on external intermediaries, where internal transaction processing directly enhances margins and anchors organic debt coverage.
• Business resilience through entire ecosystems due to the provision of a full suite of financial products/services: Square’s sticky, high-margin software subscriptions and Cash App’s resilient user base provide a structural floor for earnings stability across economic cycles.
• Operating leverage story playing out: Gross margin expansion from 28.8% (FY2020) to 42.8% (FY2025), with Adjusted EBITDA margin climbing from 5.0% to 14.1%, positions Block to deliver the guided 15% EBITDA margin in FY2026 as higher-margin services scale and AI-driven cost discipline takes hold.
• Lightly leveraged profile, supported by strong coverage metrics: Net Debt / Adjusted EBITDA of 0.06x and an interest coverage ratio of 26.8x provide a formidable margin of safety.
• Improving cash flows supports robust liquidity: Operating and free cash flow acceleration (post management’s strategic focus on profitability) ensure Block can self-fund operations internally, with US$7.86 billion in total available liquidity exceeding all outstanding borrowings.
• Attractive yields offered by short and medium expected tenor bonds: Block’s outstanding bonds provide 100+ to 200+ bps in yield pickup against comparable sovereigns and offer decent pickup compared to higher-rated peers (Fiserv and PayPal), representing solid risk-adjusted income from a credit improving toward investment-grade strength.
Company profile
Cash App serves 59 million monthly transacting actives (MTAs) and has evolved from peer-to-peer (P2P) payments into a banking destination for underbanked populations. Square operates as the operating system for 4+ million merchants, offering integrated point-of-sale (POS), software, and financing solutions.
We focus our credit analysis on core Cash App and Square segments–which now generate 99% of gross profit–as lower-margin Bitcoin and hardware segments contribute negligibly.
Recent financials: Revenue Quality Over Headline Growth
Square’s ecosystem momentum remains robust: Gross payment volume (GPV) climbed to US$245 billion, with mid-market merchants (>US$0.5 million in annual GPV) now representing 44% of total volume–a key credit positive given their higher service adoption and lower churn.
Cash App’s deepened monetisation. Monthly transacting actives (MTAs) reached 59 million as of 31 December 2025, while monetisation deepened: gross profit per MTA rose to US$124 (see chart 1 below), driven by the group’s shift toward primary banking and higher-margin financial products. This user engagement and per-user profitability improvement directly supports organic debt servicing capacity.
FY2025 gross profits climbed 16.6% YoY to US10.36 billion, reflecting both strong business momentum and the operational efficiencies Block has embedded through its AI-driven cost discipline over the past year. We note that management has signalled a 40% workforce reduction for 2026, which we expect will further enhance operating leverage and profit generation moving forward, continuing a multi-year trend (see chart 2 below).
Adjusted EBITDA (which we view as a better reflection of underlying operating performance) rose 14.4% YoY to US$3.47 billion. This positive profit trajectory (see chart 2 below), anchored by strong Square and Cash App performance, bolsters Block’s debt servicing resilience.
Chart 1: MTA remains resilient, with increasing profitability

Chart 2: Increasing gross profits + EBITDA over the years

Integration of Cash App + Square ecosystems to drive cross-selling
On the Cash App front, the shift toward primary banking is yielding tangible results. Direct deposit users spend 6x more and generate 10x the gross profit versus peer-to-peer (P2P)-only users, with primary banking actives reaching 9.3 million in December 2025 (up from 8.3 million in September). This conversion strategy delivers high-margin revenue growth and strengthens the group’s earnings stability, ultimately bolstering its ability to repay its debts.
Square’s mid-market merchant push (now representing 44% of total GPV), see chart 3 below, is equally material for its credit profile. These higher-volume merchants adopt a broader suite of services (payroll, marketing, loyalty), driving profitability and reducing churn risk. As Block deepens these relationships, client stickiness improves, anchoring more predictable cash generation.
We think the credit benefit crystallises when these ecosystems interact: internal transaction processing between Cash App users and Square merchants eliminates external interchange costs, directly enhancing margins and organic debt coverage, further enhancing the group’s credit profile.
Additionally, we highlight that while Block’s expansion into lending and Buy-Now-Pay-Later (BNPL) introduces credit cycle exposure, this risk is meticulously ring-fenced through non-recourse special-purpose vehicles and warehouse financing. This structure ensures that lending defaults have no direct claim on Block’s core operating cash or assets. Block retains modest first-loss exposure (typically 5-10% of the loan) to maintain discipline, but the compartmentalised structure shields the group from stress. Additionally, the “micro-loan” nature of products like Cash App Borrow, which caps at US$200 per user, encourages consumers to prioritise these small, habitual payments over larger, discretionary debts.
Chart 3: Mid-market merchants make up an increasing percentage of Square’s merchant base

Business Resilience through Downturns
Square Merchant Ecosystem Resilience
Next, Square’s gross GPV is heavily concentrated in “needs-based” categories, which we believe exhibit resilience through economic cycles. Approximately 35% of volume is from food and drink, and 10% from beauty and personal care. These sectors tend to exhibit more resilient demand even during downturns, as consumers continue to prioritise essential services.
Finally, the sticky nature of Square’s integrated software suite provides high-margin, predictable, recurring revenue. Services like Square Payroll, Inventory management, and shift scheduling are mission-critical; they are the “brains” of the business. Block has observed that once a merchant adopts four or more Square services, retention rates skyrocket because the operational friction of switching to a new provider is too high.
Overall, we like Square’s structural resilience as it secures the floor for interest coverage. By moving from transactional one-time processing fees to recurring software subscriptions, Square has strengthened the quality of revenue and earnings from its merchant base. For bondholders, this translates to a more predictable stream of cash available for debt servicing.
Cash App ecosystem resilience
For bondholders, this deep-seated ecosystem resilience provides a significant layer of protection. The acyclical nature of the user base ensures a resilient, recurring revenue stream that acts as a buffer against macroeconomic downturns. Furthermore, the focus on small-dollar, high-velocity credit products (like Borrow) reduces the risk of large-scale defaults, as the exposure per user is strictly managed. This unique combination of essential service utility and disciplined credit scaling supports the earnings quality of the group, reinforcing Block’s ability to service its debt obligations over the market cycle.
Block’s information advantage is its strongest defence against credit deterioration. By monitoring real-time transaction data across both the Square and Cash App ecosystems, management has live visibility into merchant health and consumer spending. This allows for near-instant underwriting adjustments, which, combined with short loan durations of 6-8 weeks, allows Block to tighten its lending portfolio at the first sign of a macro slowdown. The effectiveness of this real-time agility is evident in the group’s 2020-2025 metrics (see Table 1 below). While the Provision for Credit Losses as a percentage of gross profits stabilised at 18.70% in FY2025, the 60-day consumer delinquency rate improved to a record low of 1.05%. With a consistent 96% Afterpay on-time rate and a Square Loan loss rate of <3%, the lending segment is well-protected. Having said that, bondholders should be mindful of the possibility that in the event of heightened credit stress, these metrics could weaken materially, which would cause Block’s credit profile to deteriorate.
Table 1:
|
Metric |
31 Dec 2020 |
31 Dec 2021 |
31 Dec 2022 |
31 Dec 2023 |
31 Dec 2024 |
31 Dec 2025 |
|
FY2020 |
FY2021 |
FY2022 |
FY2023 |
FY2024 |
FY2025 |
|
|
Provision for credit losses (% of gross profits) |
14.2% |
11.1% |
17.6% |
20.4% |
19.8% |
18.7% |
|
60-day delinquency rate (Cash App) |
NA |
NA |
1.4% |
1.2% |
1.1% |
1.1% |
|
Cash App repayment rate |
NA |
97% |
97% |
97% |
97% |
97% |
|
Afterpay on-time payment rate |
NA |
NA |
96% |
95% |
95% |
96% |
|
Square Loan Loss Rate |
4.1% |
2.8% |
<3.0% |
<3.0% |
<3.0% |
<3.0% |
|
Source: Company Data, iFAST compilations. Data as of 31 December 2025 |
||||||
Growing profitability and Operating Leverage
Looking forward, management expects the group’s adjusted EBITDA margin to inch higher to 15% for FY2026. We believe this is highly achievable given the increase in sales of higher-margin services and management’s recent implementation of cost-efficiency measures.
Chart 4: Steadily improving profitability margins

Improving cash flows supports robust liquidity
Overall, Block has a robust liquidity profile. As of 31 December 2025, Block has US$7.08 billion in cash and short-term investments, against a gross debt position of US$7.29 billion. While the group has technically moved from a net cash to a slightly net debt position over recent years, this is a function of strategic debt issuance rather than operational softening. When factoring in an undrawn revolving credit facility of US$775 million, Block’s total available liquidity of US$7.86 billion provides over 100% coverage of all outstanding borrowings.
Looking forward, we expect cash flow generation to remain robust. If management maintains Capex at the guided 1% of total revenue, FCF will continue to scale alongside the expected improvement in OCF due to higher-margin, larger merchant services sales. Do note that US$450 million – US$500 million is earmarked as restructuring expense for the 40% reduction in workforce mentioned above. For bondholders, this self-funding capacity ensures Block has the financial flexibility to navigate macroeconomic volatility while comfortably meeting all future principal and interest obligations.
Chart 5: Accelerating cash flow since management’s pivot to profitability

Decent credit profile meets strong interest coverage
The group’s ability to service its debt remains strong. Despite the rise in interest expenses from recent bond issuances, the interest coverage ratio (Adjusted EBITDA / Interest Expense) stands at a formidable 26.8x (see Table 2 below). This level of coverage provides a massive margin of safety for Block to service its interest obligations.
Furthermore, Block’s debt maturity profile is well-staggered (see chart 6 below), ensuring the group faces no immediate liquidity cliffs. No more than US$2.0 billion is due in any single year, a sum easily covered by the group’s US$7.08 billion cash pile and its US$2.42 billion in annual free cash flow. This combination of low leverage, high coverage, and a balanced maturity runway effectively minimises refinancing risk. Overall, we are highly comfortable with the group’s credit metrics, as they reflect a business well positioned to handle macroeconomic volatility without compromising its credit profile.
Chart 6: Comfortable debt maturity profile

Table 2: Net debt / adjusted EBITDA + ICR over the years
|
Credit Metrics |
31 Dec 2020 |
31 Dec 2021 |
31 Dec 2022 |
31 Dec 2023 |
31 Dec 2024 |
31 Dec 2025 |
|
FY2020 |
FY2021 |
FY2022 |
FY2023 |
FY2024 |
FY2025 |
|
|
Net debt / Adjusted EBITDA* |
-2.67x |
-0.74x |
-1.07x |
-0.96x |
-0.78x |
0.06x |
|
Adjusted EBITDA / Net Interest Expense (ICR) |
8.33x |
30.60x |
27.35x |
-37.96x** |
325.63*** |
26.80 |
|
Source: Company data. iFAST compilations. As of 31 December 2025 *: negative figures are due to the group’s net cash position (net debt = gross debt – cash) **: FY2023
net interest expense was negative as interest income was greater than
interest expense |
||||||
Recommendation
Table 3: Attractive yield pickup compared to peers
|
Issue |
Issuer |
Ask Price |
Yield to Worst (%) / Yield to next call (%) |
Expected Tenor |
Credit Rating (S&P / Fitch / Moody’s) |
|
Block Inc. |
91.29 |
5.45% / NA |
5.02 |
BB+ / BBB- / Ba1 |
|
|
Block Inc. |
100.85 |
6.19% / 8.44% |
1.16 |
BB+ / BBB- / Ba1 |
|
|
Block Inc. |
98.38 |
6.28% / 7.91% |
2.41 |
BB+ / BBB- / Ba1 |
|
|
FISV 5.350% 15Mar2031 Corp (USD) |
FISERV |
101.01 |
5.11% / NA |
4.83 |
BBB / - / Baa2 |
|
FISV 5.600% 02Feb2033 Corp (USD) |
FISERV |
108.38 |
5.35% / NA |
5.88 |
BBB / - / Baa2 |
|
PYPL 4.400% 1Jun2032 Corp (USD) |
Paypal |
98.29 |
4.72% / 4.73% |
5.95 |
A- / A- / A3 |
|
PYPL 5.150% 1Jun2034 Corp (USD) |
Paypal |
99.80 |
5.18% / 5.18% |
7.95 |
A- / A- / A3 |
|
NA: Bonds do not have call dates Data as of 19 Mar 2026 Source: Bloomberg, Bondsupermart, iFAST Compilations. |
|||||
Overall, Block maintains a solid investment-grade rating. As a testament to the group’s increasing profitability and solid cash generation, Fitch ratings upgraded the issuer and its senior unsecured bonds to BBB- from BB+ in August 2025. Moving forward, we expect Block to maintain its credit profile, with scope for improvement as OCF and FCF pick up from higher-margin services sales and continued disciplined management continues to outpace the group’s modest capex requirements.
We highlight three outstanding bonds from Block (see Table 3 above). With expected tenors ranging from 1.16 years to 5.02 years, these issues provide a decent 100+ to 200+ bps yield spread over comparable US treasuries. When compared to close industry peers like Fiserv and PayPal, Block’s bonds provide a decent yield pickup of 100+ bps bps for similar tenors. Note: Both PayPal (A- by S&P) and Fiserv (BBB) have higher credit ratings than Block.
Overall, we think these outstanding Block bonds present a solid yield opportunity for investors seeking high-quality, decent income from a stable issuer.
Declaration: For specific disclosure, at the time of publication of this report, IFPL (via its connected and associated entities) holds NIL position and the analyst who produced this report holds NIL positions in the abovementioned securities. This research report was prepared with the assistance of artificial intelligence (AI) tools. iFAST Financial Pte Ltd does not rely exclusively on AI for content generation; the content of this report – including all investment theses, ratings, price targets and conclusions – has been independently reviewed and verified by the research analyst(s) to ensure accuracy and professional integrity.



